![]() Capital from the Rotunda Palace of Romanus I |
The usurper Romanus Lecapanus' unassuming manner and lowly origins were instrumental in his rise to power. Though he himself was largely responsible for the Roman's defeat by the Bulgars in Thrace, he was the man who was to profit from the chaos the loss instilled in Constantinople and the irreperable damage it did to the standing of the regent, the Augusta Zoe. While all eyes where on the aristocratic general Leo Phocas (uncle of the future emperor of that house, Nicephorus), it was the wily Romanus, who, through sheer merit, had risen to be drungarias, or admiral, of the fleet. (Though Liudprand of Cremona recounts hearing stories attributing Romanus' success to a brilliant single combat with a lion.) Son of the wonderfully named Theophylact the Unbearable, an Armenian pesant who had somehow saved Basil I from the Saracens at Tephricearond and had been rewarded with a place in the Imperial guard, seemingly shortly after Romanus' birth in about 870. The Armenians long found success in Constantinople - Leo V, "The Armenian" was an Armenian adventurer; Basil I the son of Armenian deportees; and John I Tzimises an Armenian nobles - but Romanus I reign saw an Armenian in the position of senior emperor, running the church, and, in the person of John Curcuas, the army. |
![]() |
AV solidus of Constantinople, 921-931, 4.33g, 26mm, 180º. Romanus I Lecapenus with his son, Christopher as co-emperor, 20th May 921-August 931.
Obv. +IhSXPSRЄXRЄςηAητIFγ(M*); Christ seated on lyre-backed throne, wearing nimbus cruciger, pallium and colobium, and raising right hand in benediction; in left hand, book of Gospels. Rev. ROmAη'ЄTX P(I)SτOFO'AγςςI'; Facing busts of Romanus I, with short beard on left, and Christopher, beardless on right, both crowned, holding between them a long patriarchal cross; Romanus wears traditional wrapped loros, whilst his son is clad in chlamys. Berk 276, DOC v7.13 (obverse inscription here has additional letter, F), Sear v1745 |
| The dispute over precedence between Constantine Porphyrogenitus and Christopher was solved by the introduction of this class of solidus, which simply removed Constantine from the gold coinage altogether.
DO says that on this series, the earliest ones have larger lettering and heads, like this piece. |
|
|
As Emperor, Romanus proved highly capable, though he seems always to have felt the shame of his usurption. Though an often ruthless politician, he was also a deeply pious man. (It was considered a mark of his admirable piety that he gave orders for the banishment of the Jews.) Romanus' fatal flaw proved to be his dynastic ambitions. Not content merely to have made the legitimate emperor, Constantine Porphyrogenitus, his son-in-law - and thus making him the grandfather of the future emperor Romanus II - he raised his sons to positions to which they clearly proved themselves undeserving. Of all his children, his daughter Helena, the rightful emperor's spouse, is the only one who seems to have had any principles or courage. Romanus crowned three of his sons - Christopher, Stephen and Constantine - and then tried to coopt the church as well via his youngest son, the eunech Theophylact. Basil I had been cynical enough to place his own young son on the Patriarchal throne, the boy dying shortly thereafter, but few Patriarchs have been as patently unsuitable for the position as Theophylact. Amiable and well-intentioned, Theophylact's passion was horses, and he turned his palace into a veritable stable. Though he went through the motions of his duties competently, Theophylact's blatant apathy - he attempted to lessen his boredom by introducing miracle-pantomimes into Church services - shocked society. |
![]() Chalice of the Emperor Romanus, thought to be of Romanus I |
Still, he was as nothing compared to his elder brothers, who, chafing under their father's desire to ultimately put the empire before the Lecapani, attempted to overthrow Romanus in late 944. The people had had enough of the Lecapani, and with strong popular support the all but forgotten Constantine seized the moment and seized his throne, thus ending the reign of the Lecapani.
|
|
|
Pb cast of Cherson, 921-944, 5.98g, 26mm, 0º.
Obv. P / ω; Large P / ω. Rev. Cross floriate on two steps with pellets to left and right, beneath arms of cross. Generally obscure. DOC 32a, Sear 1764 | ![]() |
| The nine specimens in my collection range in size from 22.5mm to 27mm, with weights ranging from 2.34g to 8.89g. |
|
![]() |
Pb cast of Cherson, 921-944, 3.09g, 22.5mm, 0º.
Obv. P / ω; Large P / ω. Rev. Cross floriate on two steps with pellets to left and right, beneath arms of cross. Obscure. DOC 33, Sear 1764 |
| Identical to BY262-267, but smaller and with thin flan. DO calls these smaller ones rare.
"SB 1764 var., An 477
Soviet scholars on the subject (Sokolova and Anokhin) associate this type with the 11th century (and thus with Romanos III and IV). This is not evident anywhere in either Sear or Dumbarton Oaks, and is based on hoard and other archeological evidence. Indeed, while DO suggests that no more coinage was minted in Cherson after its temporary takeover by Russians under prince Vladimir, the Soviet scholar position is that precisely the lack of these common "rho-monogram" types from hoards (presumably) generated during that campaign shows their later origin. The present specimen is towards the end of the series of many recasts from a familiar original, with a bold but much reduced obverse and almost blank reverse." - Rudnik
The nine specimens in my collection range in size from 22.5mm to 27mm, with weights ranging from 2.34g to 8.89g. |
|
![]() |
Pb cast of Cherson, 921-944, 2.65g, 16mm, 0º.
Obv. Monogram of PωmA. Rev. Monogram of B with A in lower loop. DOC 36, Sear 1767 |
| Sabatier, Oreshnikov and Wroth's British Museum Catalogue attributes this type to Romanus II, taking the reverse BA monogram to signify Basil II. Grierson disputes this, believing it unlikely that Basil's monogram would have appeared without that of his brother, Constantine VIII, and citing Burachkov in interpreting BA as basileus (emperor).
This type must then date from the last years of Romanus' reign, as monogram's of this complexity are more characteristic of later coins from this regional mint. |
|
|
Pb cast of Cherson, 921-944, 2.13g, 18mm, 0º.
Obv. P / A with m on either side. Rev. Cross floriate on two steps with pellets to left and right, beneath arms of cross. DOC 35, Sear 1768 | ![]() |
|
|
![]() |
Æ follis of Constantinople, 931-944, 4.99g. Romanus I Lecapenus as senior emperor.
Obv. +Rωm(AηbA)SILЄVSRωm'; Romanos facing, with crown and jewelled chlamys, holding globus cruciger and labarum as sceptre. Unbroken inscription. Rev. +RWm'A / n'ЄnΘЄWbA / SILЄVSRW / mAIWn' (Romanos, in Christ our God, the King of the Romans); Inscription in four lines. Berk 929, DOC 25a, Sear 1760 |
| The bust here is a compromise between the fully characterized portrait tried on the gold and silver at this time and the customary conventional portrait of a bearded senior emperor. |
|
| Leo VI | Byzantine | Coin Home | Constantine VII |